First time on the forum (howdy!) and I want to take a moment to thank you all for such an awesome product. I'm excited about using it to help communities and organizations use the system to prioritize their projects.
My question today has to do with ignition points for the burn probability layer. I understand that we can't upload our own ignition points, but is there a way to have more control over that input? I'm thinking of some sort of work around to the current limitation.
Thanks,
Esther
Best Answer
N
Nicole Vaillant
said
over 5 years ago
Hi Esther,
Thanks for the question. I think what you are asking is if there is a way to use an ignition density grid. This allows for some control over where fires occur based on defining spatially where more should occur. For example, ridgetops for lightning or roadside for human caused starts. Unfortunately the model we use in IFTDSS, which is based on FlamMap 6, Minimum Travel Time (using random ignitions) doesn't include the ability to use such a file.
Or you might be asking if you can upload and use a file with your specific ignitions. This is a feature that is available in FlamMap 6; the file is called a Fire Size List. But we opted to not allow this in IFTDSS, we feel that the random nature of the ignitions and making it so 98% of the burnable landscape burns meets the intent of the use of the model in IFTDSS and for the use with the Exposure Analysis and Risk Assessments as well. However, if enough users find this is a necessary feature to add to IFTDSS we are open to adding it as an enhancement in the future.
You can reuse ignitions for subsequent model runs using landscapes from the same footprint. First you would run the model with random ignitions (the default). Then either copy that run, or select the 'Use Ignitions from a Completed' run option in the 'Ignitions' section of the inputs in the Playground for a new run.
Welcome to the forum! Thank you for the positive feedback on IFTDSS, we’re happy to hear that the product is proving useful.
Regarding your question on Landscape Burn Probability in IFTDSS, there is not a way to influence the random ignition input for that model. I'll let our Risk modeling expert, Nicole, follow up on here to explain why that is the case. There is a reason behind it, but she has a much deeper understanding of why, and is far better at explaining it than I.
There is some information on the LBP Ignitions Input topic, but I don't really think that answers the specific question you're asking.
Josh
IFTDSS Support Team
1 person likes this
N
Nicole Vaillant
said
over 5 years ago
Answer
Hi Esther,
Thanks for the question. I think what you are asking is if there is a way to use an ignition density grid. This allows for some control over where fires occur based on defining spatially where more should occur. For example, ridgetops for lightning or roadside for human caused starts. Unfortunately the model we use in IFTDSS, which is based on FlamMap 6, Minimum Travel Time (using random ignitions) doesn't include the ability to use such a file.
Or you might be asking if you can upload and use a file with your specific ignitions. This is a feature that is available in FlamMap 6; the file is called a Fire Size List. But we opted to not allow this in IFTDSS, we feel that the random nature of the ignitions and making it so 98% of the burnable landscape burns meets the intent of the use of the model in IFTDSS and for the use with the Exposure Analysis and Risk Assessments as well. However, if enough users find this is a necessary feature to add to IFTDSS we are open to adding it as an enhancement in the future.
You can reuse ignitions for subsequent model runs using landscapes from the same footprint. First you would run the model with random ignitions (the default). Then either copy that run, or select the 'Use Ignitions from a Completed' run option in the 'Ignitions' section of the inputs in the Playground for a new run.
Nicole
1 person likes this
P
Petronila Esther Mandeno
said
over 5 years ago
Thank you both for your feedback. Yes, I was hoping to use our own specific ignitions. And I understand why you didn't include it.
If others express an interest, please add my voice to theirs (for future enhancements).
Thanks again for all your hard work!
1 person likes this
W
Will Flatley
said
1 day ago
Hello,
I also appreciate the product that you all have made available.
I wanted to follow up on Esther's question from six years ago. Has there been any change regarding users ability to add their own ignitions patterns? Or an ignition density layer? I would like to be able to increase ignition density around towns or travel corridors in a particular landscape.
Thank you!
Will
K
Kim Ernstrom
said
about 21 hours ago
Hi Will
Thanks for the follow up. We do not have a function for specified ignition patterns or ignition density. the RANDIG model is not designed for that kind of ignition - it needs to be truely random to produce the results it was designed for - if we prescribed the ignition locations than it would mess with the "likelihood" part of the probability.
There is some interesting literature out there regarding ignition locations and burn probability - here is one that I had handy...
Petronila Esther Mandeno
Hello,
First time on the forum (howdy!) and I want to take a moment to thank you all for such an awesome product. I'm excited about using it to help communities and organizations use the system to prioritize their projects.
My question today has to do with ignition points for the burn probability layer. I understand that we can't upload our own ignition points, but is there a way to have more control over that input? I'm thinking of some sort of work around to the current limitation.
Thanks,
Esther
Hi Esther,
Thanks for the question. I think what you are asking is if there is a way to use an ignition density grid. This allows for some control over where fires occur based on defining spatially where more should occur. For example, ridgetops for lightning or roadside for human caused starts. Unfortunately the model we use in IFTDSS, which is based on FlamMap 6, Minimum Travel Time (using random ignitions) doesn't include the ability to use such a file.
Or you might be asking if you can upload and use a file with your specific ignitions. This is a feature that is available in FlamMap 6; the file is called a Fire Size List. But we opted to not allow this in IFTDSS, we feel that the random nature of the ignitions and making it so 98% of the burnable landscape burns meets the intent of the use of the model in IFTDSS and for the use with the Exposure Analysis and Risk Assessments as well. However, if enough users find this is a necessary feature to add to IFTDSS we are open to adding it as an enhancement in the future.
You can reuse ignitions for subsequent model runs using landscapes from the same footprint. First you would run the model with random ignitions (the default). Then either copy that run, or select the 'Use Ignitions from a Completed' run option in the 'Ignitions' section of the inputs in the Playground for a new run.
Nicole
- Oldest First
- Popular
- Newest First
Sorted by Oldest FirstJosh
Hi Esther,
Welcome to the forum! Thank you for the positive feedback on IFTDSS, we’re happy to hear that the product is proving useful.
Regarding your question on Landscape Burn Probability in IFTDSS, there is not a way to influence the random ignition input for that model. I'll let our Risk modeling expert, Nicole, follow up on here to explain why that is the case. There is a reason behind it, but she has a much deeper understanding of why, and is far better at explaining it than I.
There is some information on the LBP Ignitions Input topic, but I don't really think that answers the specific question you're asking.
Josh
IFTDSS Support Team
1 person likes this
Nicole Vaillant
Hi Esther,
Thanks for the question. I think what you are asking is if there is a way to use an ignition density grid. This allows for some control over where fires occur based on defining spatially where more should occur. For example, ridgetops for lightning or roadside for human caused starts. Unfortunately the model we use in IFTDSS, which is based on FlamMap 6, Minimum Travel Time (using random ignitions) doesn't include the ability to use such a file.
Or you might be asking if you can upload and use a file with your specific ignitions. This is a feature that is available in FlamMap 6; the file is called a Fire Size List. But we opted to not allow this in IFTDSS, we feel that the random nature of the ignitions and making it so 98% of the burnable landscape burns meets the intent of the use of the model in IFTDSS and for the use with the Exposure Analysis and Risk Assessments as well. However, if enough users find this is a necessary feature to add to IFTDSS we are open to adding it as an enhancement in the future.
You can reuse ignitions for subsequent model runs using landscapes from the same footprint. First you would run the model with random ignitions (the default). Then either copy that run, or select the 'Use Ignitions from a Completed' run option in the 'Ignitions' section of the inputs in the Playground for a new run.
Nicole
1 person likes this
Petronila Esther Mandeno
Thank you both for your feedback. Yes, I was hoping to use our own specific ignitions. And I understand why you didn't include it.
If others express an interest, please add my voice to theirs (for future enhancements).
Thanks again for all your hard work!
1 person likes this
Will Flatley
Hello,
I also appreciate the product that you all have made available.
I wanted to follow up on Esther's question from six years ago. Has there been any change regarding users ability to add their own ignitions patterns? Or an ignition density layer? I would like to be able to increase ignition density around towns or travel corridors in a particular landscape.
Thank you!
Will
Kim Ernstrom
Hi Will
Thanks for the follow up. We do not have a function for specified ignition patterns or ignition density. the RANDIG model is not designed for that kind of ignition - it needs to be truely random to produce the results it was designed for - if we prescribed the ignition locations than it would mess with the "likelihood" part of the probability.
There is some interesting literature out there regarding ignition locations and burn probability - here is one that I had handy...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364815210003233
Also this is one of my favorite papers for reminding me of how the mainstream burn probability models work... https://pyrologix.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Understanding-Stochastic-Simulations.pdf
of course it seems new info, tools and understanding of these things come along every day now...
Cheers
Kim
-
Welcome to the IFTDSS Q&A Forum!
-
Are we required to use IFTDSS for fuels planning?
-
Why do my uploaded shapefiles disappear from my map if I navigate away from Map Studio?
-
Can I make maps for my fuels projects in IFTDSS?
-
Can I choose my own RAWS for the Auto97th fire behavior runs?
-
Map Studio
-
Summary Printing
-
Unit of Measure
-
How can a user maintain their IFTDSS account if they switch agencies?
-
Shape Files (Turning specific files on or off)
See all 45 topics